Justifying the Principle of not Paying Attention to the Objections in Patent Rights from Jurisprudential Point of View

Document Type : Original Article


1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Penal Law, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. Assistant Prof. Of Law , Law Group, Faculty of Law , Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran



Unlike the legal system that considers the transfer of debt to be absolutely independent of of influence of cause and even if it proves to be null or void, it has been recognized in accordance with the general rules of Islamic jurisprudence and civil law. Also, it is considered to be one of the pillars of any legal action, and such a transfer is, as a matter of fact, absolutely influenced by the original relationship.
In the relationship between the hands entered in negotiable instrument, there is an important deviation, from the general mentioned rule, and that is when the negotiable instrument is circulated after its signature and submission to the first  holder by indorsment, there is not heared the objections of  invalidation or inexistence of original relationship by previous hands. This concept of negotiable instruments  law have been called not Paying Attention to the Objections in Patent Rights. Because of the appearance of a clear conflict with established jurisprudential rules and traditional laws and invalidity as the origin of the right, it is unacceptable for a person bound by jurisprudential principles but in order to consider institutions  in which the lawmaker has appointed persons to be trustworthy to appearance or merely because they have genuine confidence in the emergence of the rightful owner, on the one hand, and the precision of the jurisprudential institutions that make individuals responsible for the caused damages on the other, it obliges them to e indicate that the mentioned principle is jurisprudentially justifiable.


Main Subjects

Abdollahi, A. (2009).Some rules of jurisprudence(1st ed). Qom: Book Garden.
 Akhlaghi, B. (1993). Textbook of business law 3. Tehran: Publications of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran.
Ameli Jaabi, Z. (1992). Hashiyeh al-Ershad (1st ed). Qom: Islamic Media Foundation.
Ameli Jaabi, Z. (2002). Masalak al-Afham ela-Tanqih Sharie al-Islam (2nded). Qom: Institute of Islamic Studies.
Ameli Makki, M. (1982). Al-Loma'a al-Damashqiyyah (2nded). Beirut: Arab Heritage House Publication.
Amid, H. (2013). Persian dictionary. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing Institute.
Amin, S. M. A. (1993). Hashiah Oyoun Al-Akhbar the Completion of the Rejection on the Al-Darar Al-Mukhtar Explanation ofTanwir Al-AbsarBeirut: Scientific Books House.
Ansari, M. (2001). Faraid al-Osul (5thed). Qom: Islamic Thought Association.
Ansari, M. (1952). Ketab al-Makasib (2nded). Tabriz: Ettelaat Printing House.
Ardabili, M. A. (2004). Majma 'al-Fayda wa al-Burhan fi Sharh Irshad al-Azhan (2nded). Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
Baghdadi, A. A. M. (1994). Al-Muqna'a(4thed). Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
 Bahrami, Sh. (1996). Lectures on commercial law. Shiraz: Shiraz University.
Bahrani, Y.(1991). Al-Hadayiq al-Nadharah fi Ahkam al-Atrah al-Tahirah. Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
Bazgir, Y. (1997). The criteria of commercial law in the judgments of the Supreme Court. Tehran: Bazgir Publications.
Crawford, J. (1973). Brownlie's principles of public international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalley,P. J. (2011). A theory of  agency law, University of  Pittsburgh Law Review,72(3), 495-547.
Demirchili, M., Hatami, A. & Qaraei, M. (2011). Commercial law in the current legal order. Tehran: Prosecutor Publications.
Farooqi, H. S. (1998). Legal dictionary. Beirut: Lebanese Library.
Garner, B. A. (2009). Black's law dictionaryTehran: Mizan Pulication.
Halabi, S.H. (1995). Ghonyah Aa-lnuzue mina Al-Osoul ela Al-Furue. Qom: Imam Sadegh Institute.
Hassani, M. A. (1975). Jurisprudential issues in obligation and transactions. Beirut: Scientific Foundation for Publications.
Helli, A. M. H. (1418). Rules of decrees. Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
 Hosseini Maraghi, S. M. A. (2002). Al-Anawin (2nded). Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
Izanloo, M. & MirShekari, A. (2009). Dismissal of agent. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Islamic Law Researchs, 10(30), 91-55.
Jafari Langroudi, M. J.(2009). Law of obligations (2nded).Tehran: Ganje-Danesh.
Jafari Langroudi, M. J. (1993). Legal terminology (6thed).  Tehran: Ganj-e-Danesh Library.
Jane,P. M., A. James B., Thomas B. & Arlen W. L.,( 2007). Business Law. Newyork: MC.Grow- Hill.
Karaki, A. (2006). Jame Al-Maqasid Fi Sharh Al-Qawaed (2nded).  Beirut: Al-AlBayt Foundation for the Revival of Heritage.
Karimi, A. & Alaa, M. ( 2018). Legal challenges of goodwill transactions and its effects, Quarterly Journal of Private Justice Law, 2(8), 9-27.
Katozian, N. (1997). Civil law: named Contracts (2nded). Tehran: Enteshar Company in collaboration with Bahman Borna.
Katozian, N. (2012). The general theory of obligations(6thed). Tehran: Dadgostar Publishing.
Kaviani, K. (2004). The negotiable law. Tehran: Mizan Publishing.
Kiani, R. & Tabatabai, S. M. S. (2013). Reflections of the principle of accuracy in jurisprudence and law. Quarterly Journal of Jurisprudence and Islamic Law Researchs, 9(32), 68-49.
Makarem Shirazi, N. (2006). The rules of jurisprudence (2nded).  Qom:  Ali Ibn Abi Talib School Publications.
Mann, R. A. & Barry, S. R. (2007). Essentials of business law. Ohaio: Thomson.
Martin, E. A. (2001). Oxford dictionary of law (4thed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mirzaei, A. (2010).  The collection of legal laws and Regulations(1st ed). Tehran: Behnami Publications.
Mohaghegh Damad, S. M. (2007). Rules of jurisprudence. Tehran: oloom Islami Publishing Center.
Mohammadi, A. (2004). Rules of jurisprudence (8th ed). Tehran: Mizan Publishing.
Mortazi, A. & Haj Hoseini, H. (2020). Study of the meaning of asumption and principles instead of interruption(reasons) with an Approach According to Imam Khomeini, Quarterly Journal of Jurisprudence and Islamic Law Researchs 16(60), 214-189.
Mousavi Bojnourdi, S. M. H. (1426). Rules of jurisprudence2nded). Qom: Publications of Dalil Ma.
Mousavi Bojnourdi, S. M. (2006). Rules of jurisprudence(1stedTehran: Majd Scientific and Cultural Association.
Mousavi, S. R. (Untitled). Al-Rasael. Qom: Tabatabai Publications.
Najafi, M. (2000). Jewaher-Alkelam in the explanation of Sharie al-Islam(5thed). Tehran: Islamic Bookstore.
Naraghi, A. (1994). Avaied Al-Ayyam (1st ed). Qom: Islamic Media School.
Naraqi, A.  (2006). Shiite documentary to the rules of sharia (1st ed). Beirut: Al-aLBayt Institute for the Revival of Heritage.
Rahimi Vaskesi, H., Kavianifar, H., Tabatabai Lotfi, E. S. & Karimi, N., (2021). Evolution of the principle of innocence from the perspective of Osoul sicientists. Quarterly Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, 17(62), 134-119.
Safaei, S. H., Adel, M., Kazemi, M. & Mirza Nejad, A. (2005). International sale law with comparative study (1st ed). Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Saqri, M. (2008). Commercial law: Instruments (5thed). Tehran: Enteshar Companey.
Sanhori, A. R. A. (1988). Theory of contract. Beirut: Al-Halabi Legal Publications.
 Sivari Helli, J. M. (1981). Al-Tanqih al-Ra'i for the shortening of Sharia (1st ed). Qom: Ayatollah Marashi Library.
Sokooti Nasimi, R. (2015). Analytical Discussions of negotiaible instuments law (2nded). Tehran: Majd Scientific and Cultural Association.
Sotoudeh Tehrani, H. (2009). Commercial law. Tehran: Dadgostar Publishing.
Tabatabai Haeri, S. A. (1990). Riyadh Al-Masael in the expression of the rules of Sharia by reasons (1st ed). Qom: Dar al-Hadi.
Tabatabai Yazdi, M. K. (1999). The margin of Al-Makaseb. Qom: Esmailian Institute.
Taheri, H. (2008). Rules of jurisprudence (1st ed). Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
Tousi, A. J. M. H. (2003). Al-Mabsout(Expanded) in the Imamiah Jurisprudence (1st ed). Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
Tousi, A. J. M. H. (2003). Tahdhib al-Ahkam (1st ed). Qom: Ansarian Institute.