Jurisprudential and Legal Examination of Expediency in the Family Protection Law Approved in 2012

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Jurisprudence & Principles of Islamic Law, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran

2 Department of Islamic Law & Jurisprudence, Sistan & Balochestan University, Zahedan, Iran

10.22034/ijrj.2018.541394

Abstract

Family as a unit of community is in the course of changes over time; therefore, family rights must also change in the course of social transformations. This requires that some of its provisions change with an approach of expediency element which is a subcategory of wisdom decree. Relationships among family members, especially between couples, are subjects that are influenced by changes over time, and it is natural that with the evolution of the subject, relevant rules and regulations will also be changed. The family protection law encompasses a comprehensive reflection on the issues of family and undoubtedly affects the global developments and conditions of Iran more or less. Therefore, the place of expediency in the Family Protection Law approved in 2012 can be investigated in various cases concerning family laws. According to this descriptive-analytical study, this result can be stated that some of the provisions of this law can be criticized and some of them are considered as its distinctive points. The category of counseling centers is a subject of criticism, because although the goal of these centers is to create peace and reconciliation, it virtually wastes time and causes nervous pressures in couples, especially in wife. In addition to cases which are criticized, considerations of an immediate decision such as custody, caring and visiting child and alimony, which are somewhat more vulnerable cases, are distinctive and positive points of the Family Protection Law.
 

Keywords


Ardebili, M.A. (1983). Majma Al-Faede va Al-Borhan. Qom: Jameat Al-Modaresin.
2. Bohrani, Y. (2000). Al-Hadaeq Al-Nazera. Qom: Jameat Al-Modaresin.
3. Fathi, A. (1985). Al-Manahej Al-Osouliya fi Al-Ijtihad Belrali. Damascus: Al-Sherka Al-Motahede Letozi.
4. Ghazali, A.H. (1996). Al-Mostasfi men Elm Al-Osoul. Beirut: Resalat Institute.
5. Helli, H. (1979). Kashf Al-Morad, Beirut: Al-Alami Institute.
6. Helli, M. (1984). Izah al-Favaed. Qom: Ismaeilian Press.
7. Ibn Manzour, M. (1985). Lisan al-Arab. Qom: Adab al-Hawza.
8. Kazemi, M.A. (1986). Favaed Al-Osoul Tagrira Leebhas Mirza Mohammad Hossein Al-Naeini. Qom: Jameat Al-Modarresin.
9. Khezri, B. (1965). Al-Fiqh Principles. Egypt: Al-Tijarat Al-Kubra Publication.
10. Khomeini, R. (1993). Anvar Al-Hedaya. Qom: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works .
11. Rahbar, M. (2010). Comparison of the place of expediency in Sunni and Imamiyah jurisprudence, Research Journal of Imam Sadiq University, 17(1) 56-76.
12. Sarvar al-Behsardi, A.M. (1988). Mesbah Al-Osoul, Taghrira Lebhas al-Seyed Abolghasem al-Khoyi, Qom: Al-Davoudi Publication.
13. Tavanche, M. (2013). A review and criticism on family protection law approved in 2012. Tehran: Peyk Haq.
14. Zeidan, A. (1990). Al-Madkhal Lederasa Al-Sharia Al-Islamiya. Beirut: Al-Resala Institute.